11 December 2006

EU ANNOUNCEMENT - 'FUTURE ENGLISH' PROJECT

The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the European Union rather than German, which was the other possibility.

As part of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5-year phase-in plan that would become known as "Euro-English".

In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy.

The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of "k". This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less letter.

There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with "f". This will make words like fotograf 20% shorter.

In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible.

Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling.

Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent "e" in the languag is disgrasful and it should go away.

By the 4th yer people wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w" with "v".

During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reil sensi bl riten styl.

Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru.

Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in ze forst plas.

2 Comments:

At 11:08 am, Blogger David J. Betz said...

Bwahaha! Those crafty Germans. Speaking as a dyslexic Canadian who grew up with a mix of American and British spelling (I am skeptical about armour, I am sceptical about armor, same same) not to mention Ad Speak ('buy your milk at Kwik-E-Mart') I love English spelling which is wonderfully flexible, as is its vocabulary.

NEway, dEz guys hav msD d boat. d futR of RitN eng iz txt. n a few yr.z we wiL b akcptN essays lIk DIS. itz mo efficient dun U knO?

 
At 1:48 pm, Blogger Nick Dymond said...

More efficient. Hmmm, is that the purpose of education? I have trouble with the concept of submitting formal written work in anything other than proper long-hand continuous prose. Surely, when, say, an essay is submitted, it is not merely the academic content that is being examined. The arguement for writing to a time constraint under exam conditions or to a word count is similar to this. These are important life skills to master.

This is the trouble with our policy. It's all about profit by economy rather than profit by investment.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home